The idea of a limit
Imagine walking towards a doorway. You get closer and closer, but the question that matters is not where you finally stop, it is which doorway you are aiming at. A limit works the same way: it describes the value a function approaches as \(x\) gets ever closer to some target, whether or not the function actually reaches it.
- Limit
- The value \(f(x)\) heads towards as \(x\) approaches a chosen number \(a\). We write \(\displaystyle \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L\), read as "the limit of \(f(x)\) as \(x\) tends to \(a\) is \(L\)".
The power of this idea is that the function need not even be defined at the target. We can ask where it is heading near \(x = 2\) even if \(x = 2\) itself causes trouble, and that is exactly what we do next.
Limits at a finite value
For any function built from powers of \(x\) that behaves nicely, the first thing to try is direct substitution: put the target value straight in. If you get a sensible number, that is the limit.
Evaluate \(\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 3} (x^2 + 1)\).
Factor and cancel
Sometimes substitution gives \(\tfrac{0}{0}\), which is undefined and tells you nothing on its own. This is called an indeterminate form. It usually means a common factor is hiding on the top and bottom. Factor, cancel it, then substitute again.
Evaluate \(\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 2} \frac{x^2 - 4}{x - 2}\).
Zero over zero is a signal, not an answer
Getting \(\tfrac{0}{0}\) is your cue to factor and cancel, not to write "undefined". The function has a hole at \(x = 2\), yet it still heads cleanly towards 4 from both sides, and that heading is the limit.
Behaviour as x grows
We can also ask what happens as \(x\) grows without bound, written \(x \to \infty\). The trick for a fraction of polynomials is to divide every term by the highest power of \(x\) present. Any term of the form \(\tfrac{\text{number}}{x}\) or \(\tfrac{\text{number}}{x^2}\) then shrinks towards 0.
Evaluate \(\displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{5x + 2}{2x - 1}\).
Show the step that vanishes
When you write \(\tfrac{2}{x} \to 0\), say why: the top stays fixed while the bottom grows without limit. Making that reasoning explicit is what earns Criterion C (communicating) and Criterion D (applying maths in context), rather than just landing on \(\tfrac{5}{2}\).
Check yourself
1. Evaluate \(\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 4} (2x - 3)\). +
The function is defined everywhere, so substitute directly: \(2(4) - 3 = 8 - 3 = \mathbf{5}\).
2. Evaluate \(\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 3} \frac{x^2 - 9}{x - 3}\). +
Substituting gives \(\tfrac{0}{0}\), so factor first: \(x^2 - 9 = (x - 3)(x + 3)\). Cancel \((x - 3)\) to get \(x + 3\), then substitute \(x = 3\): \(3 + 3 = \mathbf{6}\).
3. Evaluate \(\displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{4x^2 + 1}{2x^2 + x}\). +
Divide every term by the highest power, \(x^2\): \(\dfrac{4 + \tfrac{1}{x^2}}{2 + \tfrac{1}{x}}\). As \(x \to \infty\), both \(\tfrac{1}{x^2}\) and \(\tfrac{1}{x}\) head to 0, leaving \(\dfrac{4}{2} = \mathbf{2}\).
Part of the Extended Maths library. Spotted an error or want a topic added? That feedback makes the notes better.