Reading early modern English
Shakespeare wrote in early modern English, the version of the language used around 1600. It is not a different language, it is our own at an earlier stage, so most of it is readable once you get past a handful of habits. The trick is not to panic at odd spellings and old pronouns.
Three things trip students up most. First, old pronouns: thou, thee and thy simply mean you and your, used for someone close or beneath you in rank. Second, verbs with old endings like hath (has) and doth (does). Third, word order that can flip, so "speak thou plainly" just means "speak plainly".
| Old form | Modern meaning |
|---|---|
| thou, thee | you (to one person) |
| thy, thine | your, yours |
| hath, doth | has, does |
| art, wilt | are, will |
| wherefore | why |
Read to the full stop
Do not stop at the end of each line. Shakespeare's sense often runs on across line breaks, so read to the punctuation, then reword the sentence in your own plain English before you analyse it.
Blank verse vs prose
Shakespeare moves between two ways of writing, and the switch is a clue, not an accident. Most noble and serious speech is in blank verse, while ordinary chat, comedy and lower-status characters often speak in prose.
- Blank verse
- Unrhymed lines written in iambic pentameter: ten syllables per line in a soft-STRONG beat repeated five times. It sounds dignified and controlled.
- Prose
- Ordinary writing with no set rhythm or line length, laid out like normal sentences. It sounds natural, casual or plain.
Here is an original line in the blank verse pattern. Say it aloud and feel the beat: "The morning breaks and yet my heart is cold." Count the syllables and you get ten, rising in a gentle da-DUM rhythm. Compare a prose line a servant might speak: "I have not slept a wink, and my feet ache from the stairs." No rhythm, just plain talk.
The useful question in an exam is: why here? If a character who normally speaks in verse suddenly drops into prose, something has changed. Perhaps they are pretending to be mad, or their world is falling apart, and the broken rhythm mirrors it.
Context: the world behind the words
Context means the historical world a text comes from, and it shapes meaning. Shakespeare wrote in Elizabethan and Jacobean England, a time with very different beliefs from ours. Knowing a little about that world helps you explain why a scene would have gripped its first audience.
| Context | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Belief in a fixed social order | Upsetting the natural order, such as killing a king, felt like a crime against the universe. |
| Strong religious belief | Ideas of sin, guilt and the afterlife carried real weight for the audience. |
| Women's limited roles | Female parts were played by boys, and a bold female character would have seemed striking. |
| The open-air playhouse | A mixed crowd, from standing groundlings to seated gentry, needed both spectacle and poetry. |
A word of caution: context supports analysis, it does not replace it. Do not write a history essay. Bring in a fact only when it helps explain the effect of a specific line.
A modelled close reading
Here is an original line written in Shakespeare's style so we can practise the method without copying his text.
A troubled king, alone on stage, says:
"What crown can warm a hand so cold with guilt?"
Where this is assessed
Reading language closely and weaving in context is core to Criterion A (Analysing). Shaping that reading into a clear, well-ordered response supports Criterion B (Organizing).
Check yourself
1. What do "thou", "thy" and "hath" mean in modern English? +
Thou means you, thy means your, and hath means has. They are ordinary words in an older form, not a separate language.
2. What is blank verse, and how does it differ from prose? +
Blank verse is unrhymed iambic pentameter, ten syllables a line in a soft-STRONG beat. Prose has no set rhythm or line length and reads like ordinary speech. Shakespeare often gives verse to high-status or serious moments and prose to casual or comic ones.
3. Why should you use context carefully rather than heavily? +
Because context should support your analysis of the words, not replace it. Bring in a historical fact only when it explains the effect of a specific line, or you end up writing history instead of literary analysis.
Part of the English L&L library. Spotted an error or want a topic added? That feedback makes the notes better.